Make your AI survive scrutiny.
You bolted AI onto a product that already works. I break it like an attacker would, then harden it until it holds.
I did not add anything. The parts were there the whole time. I connected them, and it holds.
You shipped the feature. The cracks shipped with it.
You shipped an AI feature on a product customers already trust. Now it hallucinates, drops steps, and answers differently every time, and that churns and costs you.
A demo proves an AI can do something once. Reliability is doing it correctly every time, under a real user and an adversary. That is a different problem, and it is the one I solve.
I attack it until it breaks. Then I harden it.
I hit the feature the way a real user or an attacker will, until it breaks. Then I rebuild it as bounded parts. Nothing new gets added. The pieces were already inside your one prompt. I connect them, and the model stops breaking.
Code reads the data
Deterministic extraction, same in, same out. The model never parses raw input.
Rules in a structure
The logic and the asset library live in a structured brain, kept apart from customer data.
One small job
The prompt becomes a bounded component that does judgment, testable on its own.
A check it cannot skip
A deterministic gate runs before anything ships. If it fails the check, it does not go out.
Start small. Pay once it holds.
Reliability, proven on your own feature
We start small and hourly. You see the reliability delta on your own feature, side by side, before any commitment. The old prompt and the hardened pipeline run on the same input. The difference is visible.
Counterparty Deep Dive
Need a counterparty checked before you sign? I run the investigation and hand you a decision-ready dossier with confidence grades.